StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm" it is clear that Lionel has begun to suffer mental agony as a result of constant sniggering behind the back by some of his colleagues. Lionel is an openly gay male and likes to wear brightly colored ties. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.7% of users find it useful
Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm"

 LAW FOR BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT Table of Contents Introduction … 3 Workplace harassment … 3 Lionel’s choice … 4 Prevention better than cure … 6 Final options … 7 Conclusion … 10 Sources … 11 LAW FOR BUSINESS ASSIGNMENT Introduction Obviously, Lionel has a good work record for the eighteen months of service he has behind him in the Estate Agents firm where he is employed as promotional personnel. However, he has started experiencing physical pain in his back believed to be the result of the chair which is non-adjustable that his employers have supplied him. Lionel has also begun to suffer mental agony as a result of constant sniggering behind the back by some of his colleagues. Lionel is an openly gay male and likes to wear brightly colored ties. His sexual preference as well as the manner of his dress has become the constant source of irritable sniggering by his colleagues and Lionel is bothered his Line Manager is doing nothing to alleviate his agonies. On the contrary, she has openly snubbed Lionel on a number of occasions that he complained telling him to do his work and pay no attention to his colleagues’ taunts. Workplace harassment Workplace harassment is a serious legal offence. First of all, it is important to determine whether what Lionel is going through could be termed as harassment. Lionel is a sensitive person and does not like being teased. Had he laughed away the incident with his colleagues, the situation might have changed and Lionel could have made friends with his colleagues. However, his sexual orientation as well as his hurt attitude has compounded his woes. The crux of the issue is his sexual orientation. To others in the office Lionel is a sexual deviant. That is why they poke fun at him. Had Lionel kept quiet about his sexual preference, no one would have known and probably he would not have been treated as such a hot topic. Now there are not one but two issues to consider for remedial action. First, Lionel is suffering back pain ostensibly because of the type of chair he has been given in his office. The second issue is the difficult situation created by his colleagues’ taunts and jokes (Harassment). These issues are not beyond cure. With some diplomacy and sensitivity, the management is in a position to capably address these issues and close them so that everyone in the office forgets the issues and continue with their work. Lionel’s choice Lionel has two choices before him. The first choice is talk to the higher authorities in the firm. The higher authorities may be one or more people above his Line Manager. He is mentally and physically in pain because of the goings on in the office. He is also alone. However, he must take the initiative of taking up the issues with the top management. First, he must sort out the issue about his chair. He can then impress upon the top management that he is not amused by his colleagues’ antics and they can stop making fun of him. He can also request the top management to tell the Line Manager to be more forthcoming with his complaints. Having made his point with the top management, Lionel must also consider his position in the firm. He is one of the employees and it is necessary to keep open communication with others in the firm. If he does not pay attention to their taunts, his colleagues will tire of making him the butt of their torments. Lionel must also continue to pay attention to his work which could suffer if he gets preoccupied with his colleagues jibes. The firm’s case could get stronger if his output becomes low because of his dispute with his colleagues. The firm must tread the issue carefully because there is the possibility that Lionel could take legal recourse in case his complaints are not addressed appropriately and also because it is the firm’s policy to treat all its employees with fairness and equity. The firm must call the employees who are accused of sniggering behind Lionel’s back and warn them to behave. The firm is aware that the issue is one of banter among the employees, but it could get overblown if not corrected at once. The firm is also aware that with proper handling of the issue, the firm will be able to deal with the case if Lionel decides to file a legal suit. The firm can also ask Lionel to go for treatment for his back pain and provide him with a comfortable chair. These actions not only will help restore Lionel’s confidence but also keep the firm insulated against any legal liability. The question of liability in this case is debatable (Advice leaflet). “The question of liability arises only after there is a determination that unlawful harassment occurred. Harassment does not violate federal law unless it involves discriminatory treatment on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age of 40 or older, disability, or protected activity under the anti-discrimination statutes. Furthermore, the anti-discrimination statutes are not a “general civility code.” Thus federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not “extremely serious.” Rather, the conduct must be “so objectively offensive as to alter the ‘conditions’ of the victim’s employment.” The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminated in a tangible employment action or was sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment. Existing Commission guidance on the standards for determining whether challenged conduct rises to the level of unlawful harassment remains in effect” (Enforcement Guidance on Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, 1999). Prevention better than cure A good firm understands it is better to have proper employees’ policies in place so that there is little chance for sorting any issues through the courts. No information is available on the actual recourse Lionel takes or the firm is taking. We can only discuss probabilities. There is no information on the full staff strength of the firm and the powers of the Line Manager. The Line Manager would have been more careful had she been aware of any specific policy guiding her actions on the issue of Lionel. In the absence of any such policy, the Line Manager can only think about the work that has got to be done. The Line Manager’s action has the potential to aggravate the situation. The firm’s top management must pull up the Line Manager and impress upon her to act with more sensitivity in such cases (Understanding Workplace Harassment, 2008). The Line Manager is basically not wrong in telling off Lionel. As a matter of fact, his colleagues have only resorted to sniggering behind his back which progresses to their referring him as a “big girl” later on. The whole case points to the fact that Lionel is cracking under pressure. It also does appear that he has nowhere else to turn to and the only alternative facing him is legal action. Lionel is a responsible member of the firm. His duties include preparing property details, driving to properties to show around prospective buyers and liaising with solicitors and other professionals regarding sale of properties. He also deals with administration and has his own computer console in the open planned office. It is difficult to understand how a person vested with so much authority finds himself in such precarious condition. No details are available about Lionel’s tormentors. One can surmise that they are either equals or below Lionel’s rank. Why does Lionel not directly confront them and sort out matters? He will win better respect this way. His preference to take the matter to the Line Manager makes matters worse for him. The unsympathetic and insensitive approach of the Line Manager is the biggest culprit in the whole episode. Even if the Line Manager had just called the employees who sniggered at Lionel and given them a brief snub, matters would not have come to such a pass where Lionel has to contemplate legal action. The final straw comes in the form of non-action to Lionel’s complaint to the Line Manager the second time when the Line Manager tells him to just get out and do his job and stop behaving like a big fairy. Lionel feels like walking out then and there. Final options If circumstances do not improve, Lionel has two options. Option number one is to quit the job and find another job where his sexual preferences are not made known. Or even in case they are made known, he is given the benefit of doubt and he continues working without any mental trauma. On the issue of job, Lionel does not face any problem. On the contrary, his enormous job responsibilities make it difficult to believe Lionel is throwing such a fuss over simple thing like sniggering. He could have got better respect just walking up to the offending employees and asking them what was funny. A person who is adept at showing customers around properties, convincing them, and even managing administration for 18 months must have better nerves! Could it be that his back pain is pulling him down and making him irrational? If this is the case it is necessary for him to go for medical check up. He can also consult a lawyer to see if he can take legal recourse on the firm’s decision to provide him a chair that has been the cause of his back ache. The firm can land in serious trouble if medical experts certify that his chair is indeed the cause of his back ache. The firm has to take all possible care to ensure none of its employees suffer hardship because of any faulty furniture or equipment. The firm must also exercise due care to protect employees who complain of harassment. “An employer should make clear that it will not tolerate adverse treatment of employees because they report harassment or provide information related to such complaints. An anti-harassment policy and complaint procedure will not be effective without such an assurance. “Management should undertake whatever measures are necessary to ensure that retaliation does not occur. For example, when management investigates a complaint of harassment, the official who interviews the parties and witnesses should remind these individuals about the prohibition against retaliation. Management also should scrutinize employment decisions affecting the complainant and witnesses during and after the investigation to ensure that such decisions are not based on retaliatory motives” (Enforcement Guidance on Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, 1999). Prima facie, there appears to be a case for harassment. The uncomfortable chair and the Line Manager’s attitude sufficiently aggravate the issue for a legal case. Lionel has the option to go to the top management. That there is a Line Manager makes it obvious that the firm is big enough to have higher authorities. Therefore, if Lionel opts to go to the top management and if the top management decides to act favorably, Lionel will be adequately compensated and there will be no reason for him to approach the courts. On the other hand, if the top management is adamant and refuses to change his chair and does not act on his complaint against his colleagues and the Line Manager, Lionel has the option to approach the court. Each state has its own laws against harassment in workplace. Broadly speaking, the laws favor genuine victims and compensation depends on the type and gravity of harassment. Lionel’s can win the case and get his chair replaced and the Line Manager appropriately disciplined along with financial compensation for the mental agonies suffered. However, Lionel’s 18 months’ stint in the firm provides hope that there will be justice for him if he approaches the top management. It is difficult to surmise what the top management has to say about his sexual preference except that they might caution him against sexually exploiting anyone in the firm. Conclusion The main argument is who authorized the chair for Lionel. Why would a firm deprive an employee of a good chair unless they wanted to make things difficult for him and get him to resign? Also, why would the Line Manager continue to block Lionel’s attempts to draw her attention to his colleagues’ taunts? Unless these mysterious questions are satisfactorily answered, it will be difficult to advise Lionel precisely on his course of action. We have provided solutions in different circumstances. These solutions basically depend on the top management’s reactions to Lionel’s complaints. If they reacted favorably, Lionel has no reason to take legal action. However, in case they were adamant on not listening to Lionel, Lionel had no options but to take legal action. Sources: Advice leaflet – Bullying and harassment at work: Guidance for employees, http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=797 Employee Rights in the Workplace, 2010, http://www.mypersonnelfile.com/ Enforcement Guidance on Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, 18 June 1999, http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html Gross, Barrie; 2010, Legal Remedies for Harassment in the Workplace, http://www.allbusiness.com/human-resources/workplace-health-safety/12470-1.html Harassment, http://employeeissues.com/harassment.htm Harassment and bullying at work, September 2009, http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/dvsequl/harassmt/harrass.htm Harassment in the Workplace, 23 October 2008, http://dwd.wisconsin.gov/er/discrimination_civil_rights/harassment.htm Harassment Laws, 2010, http://employeeissues.com/harassment_laws.htm Model Policy on Harassment and a Discrimination-Free Veterinary Workplace, April 2007, http://www.avma.org/issues/policy/harassment.asp Raymond, Neeta; August-September 2003, Sexual Harassment at Work, http://www.indiatogether.org/combatlaw/vol2/issue3/harass.htm Understanding Workplace Harassment, 01 August 2008, http://www.fcc.gov/owd/understanding-harassment.html Unlawful Workplace Harassment, 17 August 2000, http://www.osp.state.nc.us/manuals/manual99/wkplhs.pdf Volokh, Eugene; Freedom of Speech vs. Workplace Harassment Law – A Growing Conflict, http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/harass/ Workplace harassment (a), 19 April 2010, http://www.deir.qld.gov.au/workplace/subjects/harassment/index.htm Workplace Harassment (b), 16 May 2006, http://www.dhrm.state.va.us/hrpolicy/policy/pol230WorkplaceHarassment.pdf Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm Case Study, n.d.)
Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm Case Study. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1736493-law-for-business-assignment
(Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action Against Estate Agents Firm Case Study)
Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action Against Estate Agents Firm Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/1736493-law-for-business-assignment.
“Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action Against Estate Agents Firm Case Study”. https://studentshare.org/law/1736493-law-for-business-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why Did Lionel Take Legal Action against Estate Agents Firm

Legal Action Against Daley Motor Company

Name Date Course Number and Section Response to Inquiry Regarding legal action against Daley Motor Company Dear Mr.... Cleese, Thank you for taking the time and to seek legal counsel from Citizen's Advice Bureau with regards to possible legal action with regards to Daley Motor Company.... However, before I offer specific advice on that topic, I believe it would be beneficial to review the essential elements of a binding legal contract.... What this means is that each and every binding legal contract must have these two phases....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Civil Legal Actions Against Unethical Business Practices

The paper "Civil Legal Actions against Unethical Business Practices" discusses that government has shown that it is concerned about the common man as well and not only interested in keeping the organizations making billions of dollars in business despite the consequences of their actions.... Ethics can be a complicated topic as some individuals suggest that businesses are not necessarily bound by any ethics as long as their actions do not go against the laws that have been set to govern them (Duska, 2007)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Minco NL: Legal Issues

Contents PART A 2 Step 1: Identify legal Issue/s 2 Step 2: Relevant Law 2 Step 3: Apply the Law 3 Step 4: Conclusion 3 PART B 4 Step 1: Identify legal Issue/s 4 Step 2: Relevant Law 5 Step 3: Apply the Law 6 Step 4: Conclusion 7 PART C 8 Step 1: Identify legal Issue/s 8 Step 2: Relevant Law 8 Step 3: Apply the Law 10 Step 4: Conclusion 11 PART A Step 1: Identify legal Issue/s The legal issues in the mentioned case relate to the extent of compliance requirement of Minco NL with the company's constitution and the proper process to amend it....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business

hellip; The notion of vicarious liability or the legal doctrine of “respondeat superior” holds business principals responsible for the torts of their agents1, therefore in the case of DWI, this would mean that the firm could be responsible for the illegal harmful acts of their agents or employees....   The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business The notion of vicarious liability or the legal doctrine of “respondeat superior” holds business principals responsible for the torts of their agents1, therefore in the case of DWI, this would mean that the firm could be responsible for the illegal harmful acts of their agents or employees....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Agency Business Authority

agents have certain duties to their principals.... Again agents have a major duty to reveal to the principal information gathered from outside sources regarding matters relevant to business “that is important to the principals.... This action has made her liable under law of criminal tort and negligence.... However, this was also not done, making her an ideal candidate for tort, criminal action under agency laws and fraudulent conduct....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

State Farm Insurance Agency

While its a huge company, with 79,000 employees and more than 16,000 agents, many say it feels more like a family business than a big conglomerate” (State, 2009).... Emotional exhaustion is caused by several factors, and by looking at these factors, managers can add interventions to the program that will help them be better prepared to spot the signs of what may be called employee burnout and take effective measures against it where possible.... State Farm can also take advantage of new technology to improve business communication....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Role and Purpose of the Human Rights Act 1998

The Human Rights Acts 1998 is an Act that incorporates the large European Convention of Human Rights into the United Kingdom law in October 2000 (Rights, 2007).... Also known as HRA or the Act, it is composed of a number of sections that have the effect of organizing into a code or… This means all public bodies such as local government, police, courts, publicly funded schools, hospitals, and others bodies running or carrying out public The implication of this is that, any individual can pursue human rights cases in any domestic courts, that means; they no longer have to visit Strasbourg so as to argue or stage their cases in the European Court of Human Rights....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Class Action Lawsuit Against University Royal Beauty Pageants

Our firm believes that while they may be carried out with the best of motivation, their execution is one that is terribly flawed, and could be greatly detrimental to the well being of these children in the future, accompanied by the severe lack of laws governing the state and regulation of beauty pageants (Nussbaum, 2008) thus feel that legal action must be taken against the child beauty pageant industry.... The paper "Class Action Lawsuit against University Royal Beauty Pageants" states that child beauty pageant industry has become a business more than a competition, and University Royalty is the prime promoter....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us