StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical imperatives - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
In reference to Immanuel Kant’s work, both hypothetical and categorical imperatives have been immensely and clearly differentiated. To start with, hypothetical imperatives are considered as instructions which direct one to act in a certain manner or way so as to achieve a desired result…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical imperatives
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical imperatives"

Download file to see previous pages

In reference to Immanuel Kant’s work, both hypothetical and categorical imperatives have been immensely and clearly differentiated. To start with, hypothetical imperatives are considered as instructions which direct one to act in a certain manner or way so as to achieve a desired result. For instance, if one considers owning an expensive car, then he or she must search for a good paying job to contribute in coming up with the funds. In most instances, hypothetical imperatives apply to individuals who wish to achieve the results.

On the other hand, categorical imperatives are instructions which direct individuals on what to do irrespective of one’s desires. In other words, they are referred to as commands since one is left with no option but to act accordingly, an example: Though shall not murder. The results are normally good and of upright morals. Kant (vi) claims that the moral law can only be expressed in the form of a categorical imperative due to the fact that it is imposed by the reason itself but not externally.

He also states that the moral law applies universally and should therefore have standard ordering principle in which everyone is expected to observe. Kant is therefore right because, when the moral law is expressed in terms of comparative imperative then the society at large works harmoniously and each member acts as a law unto himself. This then becomes an ideal place for a morally upright community. Q 2: How does Kant explain the difference between perfect and imperfect duties According to Kant, would it be permissible to tell a lie if the lie might save someone's life Explain Kant's position on this and whether or not you agree.

According to the ground work by Kant (103), he focuses on two types of duties which include perfect and imperfect. Kant looks at perfect duties as the actions which when evaluated according to the first maxim, they bring about innate contradictions. To state it in clear terms, they are actions that produce innate contradictions when they are reasonably applied as worldwide laws. For instance, murder would be considered as a perfect duty since if murder was to be applied as a world wide law it would eventually lead to an inherent contradiction.

Since murder cannot be rationally applied as a universal law, it is therefore not permissible under the first maxim. On the other hand, imperfect duties involve various acts that when evaluated according to the first maxim or when they are reasonably applied as universal laws; they do not bring about any inherent contradictions (Kant 104). According to Kant, lying is considered as an imperfect duty since if it were applied as a universal law, it would not raise any inherent contradiction. Lying is therefore not allowed under the first maxim despite its application as a universal law.

In reference to Kant, it would therefore not be permissible to tell a lie even if it would save someone's life. In my opinion, a lie which would save someone's life is necessary since one will have played a role in saving a life which is very critical. However, lying should not be used as a form of defense or for purposes of obtaining favor. Q 3: People in distress often make "false promises" in order to alleviate their situation. According to Kant, is such action in accordance with the moral law or not Paying particular attention to his understanding of the categorical imperative and what it prescribes, explain Kant's position on this.

Do you agree with Kant Why or why not According to Kant, making of false promises so as to alleviate one's situation is not in accordance with the moral law since it rests on a maxim that can be comprehensibly universalized. The moral rules normally require telling the truth and keeping of promises, therefore making of false p

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical Essay”, n.d.)
What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1525385-what-are-the-main-differences-between-hypothetical-and-categorical-imperatives
(What Are the Main Differences Between Hypothetical and Categorical Essay)
What Are the Main Differences Between Hypothetical and Categorical Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1525385-what-are-the-main-differences-between-hypothetical-and-categorical-imperatives.
“What Are the Main Differences Between Hypothetical and Categorical Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1525385-what-are-the-main-differences-between-hypothetical-and-categorical-imperatives.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical imperatives

Define And Discuss The Term Ethics From Your Own Perspective

categorical imperatives are not hypothetical and therefore not prefaced by ‘ifs” (Braswell, 2012, p.... Hypothetical imperatives make allowances for a “command that begin with ‘if'” (Braswell, 2012, p.... Explain and Discuss Kant's categorical imperative.... Thus Kant developed what is referred to as the categorical imperative which is contrasted with the “hypothetical imperative” (Braswell, et.... Kant formulated a number of aspects of categorical imperative....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Justice within Business

Kant's idea of the categorical... He describes a knave as someone who "is not sincerely honest, and does to others what he would dislike to have done to himself".... The story of the buyer and the seller of sugar both attempting to manipulate the other in order to get eh best price possible for what they consider to be the situation is both funny and revealing.... The irony that "both understood the market very well" and yet also seem to have been self-deceived as to the surety of what they are hearing is wonderful....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Correlation of Ethics and Governance

This paper outlines the main Kantian Imperatives,  features of Ethics and Child Labor, the perspective of Utilitarian ethics, key aspects of Utilitarianism.... In the next section a discussion of Kantian ethics, especially with regard to the two types of imperatives that he first mentioned in his Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, is undertaken.... n Section II of Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant explains the capacity of will as a practical reason – the ability to cause actions according to principles the agent represents to himself – and principles thought of as applying to the will objectively as a matter of rationality are represented in the form of imperatives (Kant 1989)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Accounting Ethics Questions

Accounting Ethics Questions differences between Utilitarianism and Egoism The proportion by which actions tend promote happiness defines how right such actions are while the proportion by which actions tend to promote the reverse of happiness defines how wrong the actions are (Duska, Duska, & Ragatz, 2011).... differences between a Categorical Imperative and a Hypothetical Imperative A categorical imperative is an unconditioned objective that every agent ought to obey whether s/he is reasonable to be rational to or irrational to be tempted to do the opposite....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Immanuel Kants Solution to Human Problems

On the based-on types of schemes, philosophers have argued for the existence of any difference between them.... Some of the philosophers have stipulated that there is no observable difference while others have stuck to the differences mentioned above.... The differences are, however, less significant in this project as Kant bases his arguments on pirate judgment prior basis of this research project, therefore, is to identify and explain the reasoning behind Kant's questions....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

The Examination of Kants Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals

ant has tried to differentiate between the hypothetical and categorical imperatives by showing how one of them only is an imperative of morality.... he main reason why hypothetical imperatives may be seen as conditional is that they only state good action that is necessary means to an end.... Of notable concern is the fact that since hypothetical imperatives are applicable only to people who want to achieve a certain goal, one can go on and steal if he does not mind being arrested....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics

To effectively uphold virtues humans must uphold the courage to choose between extreme vices, generosity to disburse to assist others, honesty to always tell the truth, and allegiance to friends and family through love and affection and devotion.... This means that actions have to balance between happiness and unhappiness for all....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Philosophical Ethics

This work called "Philosophical Ethics" describes the three formulations of categorical imperatives: the “universalizing” formulation, the end-in-itself formulation, and the “autonomy” formulation.... hellip; The Difference between Kantian Categorical Imperative and Hypothetical Imperative: the difference between Categorical imperative and hypothetical imperatives lies in the fact that, while the categorical imperatives are absolute and admit of no exceptions, the hypothetical imperatives are relative and admit of exceptions....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us